Abstract

Background. Lower gestational age negatively affects the neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants. Early motor repertoire is a reliable way to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes. This study aimed to determine the correlation between gestational age and early motor repertoire in infants and also the roles of multiple pregnancies, gender, cranial utrasonography (USG) results, and birth weight in this relationship.

Methods. This study included 139 infants, who were video recorded 9-17 weeks post-term. The recordings were evaluated using the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R). Structural equation modeling tool was used for the path analysis of the models.

Results. There was a weak positive correlation between gestational age and the MOS-R. In the relationship between gestational age and the MOS-R, multiple pregnancies, gender, and USG outcomes had a moderating effect. While abnormal USG, male gender, and singleton pregnancy increased this correlation to a moderate level, normal USG reduced the strength of the correlation. Female and twin pregnancies were non-significant in the model. Birth weight had a full mediating effect on the relationship between gestational age and the MOS-R.

Conclusions. Infants with younger gestational age or lower birth weight, male infants, and infants with problems on cranial USG may have poorer early motor repertoire.

Keywords: birth weight, gestational age, motor repertoire, gender, cranial ultrasonography

Copyright and license

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite

1.
Kahraman A, Aksoy A, Öz Tunçer G, Erdem S, Livanelioğlu A. The role of certain perinatal features in the early motor repertoire of infants. Turk J Pediatr 2024; 66: 287-296. https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.4513

References

  1. Linsell L, Malouf R, Morris J, Kurinczuk JJ, Marlow N. Prognostic factors for cerebral palsy and motor impairment in children born very preterm or very low birthweight: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2016; 58: 554-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12972
  2. Allotey J, Zamora J, Cheong-See F, et al. Cognitive, motor, behavioural and academic performances of children born preterm: a meta-analysis and systematic review involving 64 061 children. BJOG 2018; 125: 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14832
  3. Pascal A, Govaert P, Oostra A, Naulaers G, Ortibus E, Van den Broeck C. Neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm and very-low-birthweight infants born over the past decade: a meta-analytic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2018; 60: 342-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13675
  4. Tchamo ME, Prista A, Leandro CG. Low birth weight, very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight in African children aged between 0 and 5 years old: a systematic review. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2016; 7: 408-415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174416000131
  5. Topp M, Huusom LD, Langhoff-Roos J, et al. Multiple birth and cerebral palsy in Europe: a multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 548-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00545.x
  6. Sellier E, Goldsmith S, McIntyre S, et al; Surveillance Of Cerebral Palsy Europe Group And The Australian Cerebral Palsy Register Group. Cerebral palsy in twins and higher multiple births: a Europe-Australia population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2021; 63: 712-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14827
  7. Himmelmann K, Uvebrant P. The panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. XI. Changing patterns in the birth-year period 2003-2006. Acta Paediatr 2014; 103: 618-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12614
  8. Romeo DM, Venezia I, Pede E, Brogna C. Cerebral palsy and sex differences in children: a narrative review of the literature. J Neurosci Res 2023; 101: 783-795. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.25020
  9. Peaceman AM, Mele L, Rouse DJ, et al. Prediction of cerebral palsy or death among preterm infants who survive the neonatal period. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41: 783-789. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1788-6281
  10. Bosanquet M, Copeland L, Ware R, Boyd R. A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013; 55: 418-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12140
  11. Einspieler C, Prechtl HFR. Prechtl’s assessment of general movements: a diagnostic tool for the functional assessment of the young nervous system. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005; 11: 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20051
  12. Kwong AKL, Fitzgerald TL, Doyle LW, Cheong JLY, Spittle AJ. Predictive validity of spontaneous early infant movement for later cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2018; 60: 480-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13697
  13. Einspieler C, Bos AF, Krieber-Tomantschger M, et al. Cerebral palsy: early markers of clinical phenotype and functional outcome. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 1616. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101616
  14. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis Group; 2010.
  15. Babson SG, Benda GI. Growth graphs for the clinical assessment of infants of varying gestational age. J Pediatr 1976; 89: 814-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(76)80815-3
  16. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  17. Herrero D, Einspieler C, Panvequio Aizawa CY, et al. The motor repertoire in 3- to 5-month old infants with Down syndrome. Res Dev Disabil 2017; 67: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.05.006
  18. Fjørtoft T, Evensen KAI, Øberg GK, et al. High prevalence of abnormal motor repertoire at 3 months corrected age in extremely preterm infants. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2016; 20: 236-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.12.009
  19. Tekerlek H, Mutlu A, Inal-Ince D, et al. Motor repertoire is age-inadequate in infants with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Res 2021; 89: 1291-1296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-1082-4
  20. Örtqvist M, Einspieler C, Marschik PB, Aden U. Movements and posture in infants born extremely preterm in comparison to term-born controls. Early Hum Dev 2021; 154: 105304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105304
  21. Salavati S, Berghuis SA, Bosch T, et al. A comparison of the early motor repertoire of very preterm infants and term infants. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2021; 32: 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.03.014
  22. Dostanic T, Sustersic B, Paro-Panjan D. Developmental outcome in a group of twins: relation to perinatal factors and general movements. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2018; 22: 682-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.04.006
  23. Garg P, Abdel-Latif ME, Bolisetty S, Bajuk B, Vincent T, Lui K. Perinatal characteristics and outcome of preterm singleton, twin and triplet infants in NSW and the ACT, Australia (1994-2005). Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95: F20-F24. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.157701
  24. Bonellie SR, Currie D, Chalmers J. Comparison of risk factors for cerebral palsy in twins and singletons. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 587-591.
  25. Babatunde OA, Adebamowo SN, Ajayi IO, Adebamowo CA. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of twins compared with singleton children: a systematic review. Twin Res Hum Genet 2018; 21: 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2018.3