Abstract
The clinical course of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is heterogeneous in children. To evaluate the clinical course and the predictors of outcome in Turkish children with primary FSGS, a retrospective study was conducted by the Turkish Pediatric Nephrology Study Group in 14 pediatric nephrology centers. Two hundred twenty-two patients (92 boys, 130 girls, aged 1-16 years) with biopsy-proven primary FSGS were included. One hundred forty-eight patients were followed-up for a median of 51 months (range: 0.26-270). The clinical course was characterized by complete remission in 50 (33.8%), persistent proteinuria in 50 (33.8%) and progression to renal failure in 48 (32.4%) patients. Progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was significantly higher in patients who did not attain remission. Complete remission, partial remission and progress to renal failure were recorded in 37%, 32% and 28%, respectively, of the patients (n = 73) treated with prednisone combined cyclophosphamide/cyclosporine A. However, in patients (n = 33) treated with pulse methyl prednisolone plus oral prednisone (up to 20 months) combined with cyclophosphamide, complete remission in 51.5% and partial remission in 27.3% of the patients were noted. Progression to renal failure was observed in 9.1% of this group of patients. Multivariate analysis showed that only plasma creatinine at presentation was an independent predictive value for outcome. Patients with serum creatinine level higher than 1.5 mg/dl had 6.6 times increased rate of progression to renal failure. Failure to achieve remission is a predictor of renal failure in children with primary FSGS. The use of immunosuppressive treatment in conjunction with prolonged steroid seems beneficial in primary FSGS in children.
Copyright and license
Copyright © 2010 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.